Quantum Liabilities: Who Would Be at Fault If You Were Hurt Using a “Star Trek” Transporter?
Posted on Monday, April 16th, 2018 at 4:50 pm
For questions related to Covid-19, view this Covid-19 FAQ page. Attorney Kirby Farris and Attorney Jessica Zorn are regularly updating it with relevant information.
You can also tune into LawCall on WBRC Fox 6 Sundays at 10:30pm CST. We will be taking questions on how Covid-19 will impact our community and your legal claims. If you have questions for us related to Covid-19, please call in live to 1-855-LAW-1955 or submit your questions here: www.lawcall.com/birmingham/. To read more please click here
During this uncertain time, Farris, Riley & Pitt understands that our clients and our community need us now more than ever. While we are fully available to our clients, the health and safety of our team is equally as important. We are taking precautionary measures by following best practices, as outlined by the Jefferson County Health Department, as well as allowing employees with secure remote access to work from their homes. Any employee who is sick understands that they will not be able to return to work until medically cleared. Our main office is still open and operating; however, we have relocated several in-office employees and are encouraging meetings to occur via phone or video conference.
If the time comes to transition all employees to a remote position, we are prepared. To encourage a better work/life balance for our team, many of our employees either currently work or have worked remotely in the past. As such, our clients or anyone who calls for a free case evaluation should not experience any interruptions in our typical operations. We have security measures in place to ensure that all of our clients’ data is protected and will not be compromised regardless of where our employees are operating.
We are also working with the courts, as well as opposing counsel, to arrange court appearances, settlement conferences, and other litigation events remotely whenever possible.
Each day is an adjustment, and our team is dedicated to adapting accordingly in order to progress cases for our current clients as well as take on matters for new clients.
Posted on Monday, April 16th, 2018 at 4:50 pm
Categories: Defective Products
Posted on Monday, April 16th, 2018 at 4:46 pm
Riding a motorcycle can be one of the most thrilling ways of getting around town, often providing an unmatched feeling of freedom during an otherwise normal commute. However, since some legislation has recently changed, everyone may not be aware of the current Alabama motorcycle laws and others may have questions about what they’re legally required to have on their person during a ride. If you’re currently a rider or plan to become one soon, here’s what you need to know about riding a motorcycle in the Yellowhammer State so you can stay safe and avoid getting pulled over.
For many years, Alabama was the only state that did not require a specific license or endorsement for operating a motorcycle. It only required the rider have a regular driver’s license and be 16 years of age or older. That law was recently changed. As of May 2015, all Alabama riders must possess a driver’s license with a class M endorsement to operate a motorcycle. To obtain the endorsement, you must either pass the DPS’ motorcycle knowledge exam or complete a motorcycle safety course.
An endorsement isn’t the only thing required to ride. According to Alabama law Section 32-12-41, a safety helmet “specifically designed for motorcycle riders and motorcycle passenger use” is legally required when operating a motorcycle. The law also has specifications regarding the exterior shell, padding, chin strap and cradle. Visors, while not required, must be flexible or “of a snap on type” for example. Here is some more information about legally required accessories and regulations, as detailed by AmericanMotorcyclist.com:
Required/Regulated
| Not Required/Regulated
|
Riders should also be aware that lane splitting, which refers to driving in between traffic lanes on the center lines, is illegal. However, two bikes may share one lane side by side.
Unfortunately, motorcycle collisions, especially those involving vehicles, are all too common. There were 74 motorcycle driver fatalities in 2015.1 That same year, motorcyclist deaths accounted for 14 percent of total traffic fatalities nationwide.2 These statistics highlight the importance of utilizing certain safety items and why they’re recommended by riding experts even though they’re not legally required.
Despite riders’ best efforts and the many laws in place to keep all motorists safe while sharing the road, accidents do happen. In those instances, it’s important you seek experienced legal services from lawyers who will fight for your best interests.
Farris, Riley & Pitt, LLP have many years of experience advocating for motorcyclists who were seriously injured in an accident that could have been avoided had another driver acted responsibly. If you or a loved have been injured in a collision and you believe you are entitled to financial compensation, contact Farris, Riley & Pitt by calling 205-324-1212 or visit our website to start your FREE case evaluation today!
1 http://drivesafealabama.org/uploads/files/ALDOT-2015-CrashFactsBook.pdf
2 https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2017-01/Spotlight%20Motorcycle%202016%20H.pdf
Categories: Automobile Accident, Personal Injury
Posted on Friday, April 13th, 2018 at 6:23 pm
According to data compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 42.6 million Americans were affected by 899 new recalls of vehicles, auto equipment, child safety seats and tires in 2017. Even worse, these astronomical numbers are low when compared to recent years. 2015 saw more than 86.3 million safety recalls, and 2016 wasn’t far behind at around 78.8 million.1
Given how widespread the issue is, you may expect that many vehicle owners affected by recalls would promptly bring their vehicles in for repairs. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Data suggests that only 70 percent of those eligible for repairs act upon vehicle recalls. That means 30 percent of warned drivers are operating a vehicle that could fail on them, endangering not only themselves and their passengers, but also everyone else on the road.2
These numbers are even more abysmal for certain types of recalls. According to J.D. Power, the percentage of remedied recalls is much lower for:
These percentages are startling, but they don’t have to be. Vehicle recalls are serious and easily remedied, which is why every owner should heed recall notices and check the recall status of their vehicle twice a year.
Many vehicle owners don’t realize auto recalls always pertain to mechanisms that pose a significant safety risk if they were to malfunction. Minor issues like paint misapplications, air conditioning defects and exterior rust do not warrant a recall. Neither does general wear and tear, as the vehicle owner would be expected to handle this on their own through regular vehicle inspection and maintenance. However, manufacturing problems that directly impact safe operation of a motor vehicle are subject to recalls, including:
Recalls are issued either through the manufacturer themselves or through NHTSA. Since manufacturers generally want to preserve their public image and NHTSA only has jurisdiction over safety issues, you can be sure that any vehicle recall poses a real danger.
Some recalls are initiated by the manufacturer themselves if they become aware of a manufacturing problem or if they realize their vehicle does not meet the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), which dictate the minimum performance acceptable for vehicles and vehicle parts. Much of the time, however, vigilant consumers draw NHTSA’s attention to a problem by submitting complaints.
Any person can submit a complaint:
After reviewing the complaints, NHTSA compiles the information and identifies trends. If they feel there is a safety concern, or if they grant a petition to open an investigation, they will begin a Preliminary Evaluation (PE), which can last up to four months. If the PE indicates an issue and the manufacturer refuses to send out a recall, NHTSA conducts an in-depth Engineering Analysis (EA) that can last up to a year. With sufficient evidence of a safety issue, they will send a Recall Request Letter to the manufacturer. In some cases, the manufacturer will still resist and a Public Meeting will be ordered to decide the matter. The manufacturer is also allowed to dispute a recall decision in Federal District Court.
As you can see, the recall process is thorough and often time consuming, relying upon stringent federal regulations and vehicle testing and analysis. Input from hundreds to thousands of concerned consumers is also considered. By the time the recall notice arrives in your mailbox, your vehicle may be well overdue for repair or replacement.
Maybe you figure you’ll hedge your bets by skipping repair, replacement or a refund and continue driving your vehicle as is. While going in for a repair may be a minor inconvenience, there is really no downside to remedying a recalled vehicle or part. The manufacturer is required to offer repair free of charge, a suitable replacement or a refund that matches the value of your vehicle, taking depreciation into account. All you have to do is take advantage of the offer by going to your local dealer!
You may even be eligible for reimbursement if you already paid for repair or replacement of the vehicle or part in question. Be sure to keep receipts for all vehicle repairs so you can supply documentation to the manufacturer.
If you are unsure whether your vehicle, auto equipment, child safety seat or tires have been recalled, visit this NHTSA recall page. To use the vehicle search, you will need to know your vehicle identification number (VIN). The VIN is usually located on the:
You can also contact the manufacturer if you cannot find your VIN.
Sometimes an auto recall reaches a consumer too late to prevent catastrophe. If you have been injured in an accident due to a defective vehicle or vehicle part, the lawyers at Farris, Riley & Pitt, LLP will fight for your compensation.
We have more than 20 years of experience in the Birmingham area, including extensive experience advocating for clients in all types of product liability cases. Call us today at (205) 324-1212 for your free consultation.
1https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/2017_recall_annual_report_updated011818_0.pdf
2https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/us-dot-and-maryland-mva-collaborate-improve-recall-remedy-rates
Categories: Defective Products
Posted on Friday, March 9th, 2018 at 8:02 pm
Autonomous trucking is a big deal these days. While many are enthusiastic advocates, others are concerned about what autonomous trucking would mean for society and the industry as a whole. (more…)
Categories: Automobile Accident
Posted on Friday, March 9th, 2018 at 7:58 pm
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) was established through the Consumer Product Safety Act of 1972. It is the federal government organization that evaluates consumer products, catalogs and analyzes industry safety studies and consumer complaints, and coordinates recall efforts for unsafe consumer products.1 (more…)
Categories: Personal Injury
Posted on Friday, March 9th, 2018 at 7:50 pm
Many medical devices manufactured for public use work well and pose little to no risk to the general public when used as prescribed, but the success rate is nowhere near perfect. Even the most well intentioned medical professionals can do more harm than good by using faulty medical products while treating patients. (more…)
Categories: Malpractice and Defective Medical Devices
Posted on Monday, November 20th, 2017 at 5:00 pm
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In your initial meeting with an attorney, a lot of ground is covered. You may discuss what happened or how you’ve been affected. Often times, so much needs to be discussed that the basics can be pushed into the background:
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Categories: Personal Injury, Uncategorized
Posted on Monday, June 5th, 2017 at 2:48 pm
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Tom James will be speaking at an ICLE webcast seminar as a plaintiffs’ lawyer expert on the issues of informal legal discovery in accident cases. The webcast seminar is open to all Michigan lawyers.
Although Tom was asked to speak primarily from the plaintiff injury lawyer perspective, the legal discovery seminar is more about the many universal and informal legal discovery strategies that attorneys can apply to better serve their clients. These are the strategies that smart lawyers from both sides use to move cases faster and reach great settlements for their clients.
They are also the strategies that lawyers normally do not learn in law school.
The discovery strategies unique to plaintiffs that Tom will review include informal ways to make sure attorneys know about ALL of the layers of insurance coverage, ordering complete driving records, how to find and discover redacted records, and how lawyers can verify injuries and lifestyle change evidence to meet serious impairment and threshold challenges in automobile accident cases.
The webcast will become part of the ICLE continuing education on demand. You can take a look here.
ICLE is the Institute of Continuing Legal Education for lawyers. The organization provides training and education to Michigan lawyers.
Tom focuses his practice on litigating auto accidents and No Fault insurance disputes. He has taken more than 30 cases to trial, including several that have resulted in multimillion dollar verdicts. Two of the cases he’s taken to trial have been the top- reported automobile accident trial verdict in Michigan, according to year-end compilations of trial verdicts and settlements by Michigan Lawyers Weekly. Prior to joining the firm, Tom worked at the St. Joseph County Prosecutor’s Office. Tom started at Michigan Auto Law as a law clerk in his second year of law school.
He’s been named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly “Up and Coming Lawyer,” a Michigan Super Lawyer and a Michigan Association for Justice “Pacesetter.” Tom is a member of the Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, the Michigan Association for Justice, the American Association for Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union. Tom frequently speaks at legal educational seminars throughout the country on topics dealing with trucking and auto accident litigation strategies and No Fault law.
This entry was tagged Tags: Attorney Tom James, discovery, ICLE[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Categories: Automobile Accident
Posted on Monday, January 30th, 2017 at 2:45 pm
Over 1,500 cases filed in Bard IVC Filter MDL in Phoenix, AZ, before Honorable David G. Campbell. The filters alleged to have caused injury are Bard’s “optional” filters – i.e. those that Bard has represented to be removable after the risk of pulmonary embolism has passed – the Recovery, G2, G2X, Eclipse, Meridian and Denali filters.
The parties are currently working through general and case specific (trial pick or “bellwether” selections) discovery, with the first bellwether case to be tried in the fall of this year.
The MDL plaintiffs are also seeking certification of a medical monitoring class action with the goal of requiring Bard to establish and pay for a protocol to monitor patients who received optional filters that, due to incorporation into the body, cannot be removed despite no longer being needed.
The trial of the first Bard state court case (non-MDL case) since the MDL was created is the Austin v. Bard, et al matter, pending in Broward County, Florida. The trial is scheduled for March. The case involves allegations of serious complications from a G2 filter, requiring an open procedure for removal.
The Alabama-based law firm of Farris, Riley & Pitt, LLP has experience with IVC filter “>defective medical device cases and all forms of medical malpractice. We help clients nationwide determine if they have a claim against IVC filter manufacturers.
The time you have to protect your rights is limited. Please contact our office to speak with one of our Alabama IVC filter attorneys today at (205) 324-1212.
Categories: Personal Injury, Uncategorized
Contact us for a FREE consultation.
There’s no fee unless we win.
This is an extremely difficult question to answer. The value of a case is based on a wide range of criteria including:
All cases are unique and we assess them on a case-by-case basis.
To have a personal injury case, you must have suffered an injury, and that injury had to be at least partially the fault of another. The injury can be physical or non-physical depending upon the case and the basis of the lawsuit. Invasion of privacy, assault, infliction of emotional distress or an attack on your reputation are examples of injuries that are non-physical.
Some cases settle within weeks, while others require litigation and can take over a year to reach completion.
Why you should choose
Farris, Riley & Pitt, LLP to
represent you after an
accident